Topological Vortex Theory and the Scientific Validation of the Dialectical Materialist Law of Unity of Opposites (5)

0
107

The significance of this interdisciplinary research lies not only in "defending" dialectical materialism but also in deepening our understanding of spacetime, matter, and complexity through dialogue between philosophy and physics. As topological vortex theory develops further and undergoes experimental testing, the scientific nature of the law of the unity of opposites will continue to receive richer and more precise modern interpretations.

References

  1. Che, Z., Liu, W., et al. Propagation-invariant spatiotemporal vortices. Science Bulletin, 70, 3758-3763 (2025).
  2. Chen, Z., Xu, J., et al. Topological orbital angular momentum extraction and twofold protection of vortex transport. Nature Photonics (2024).
  3. Wang, B., Che, Z., et al. Topological water-wave structures manipulating particles. Nature, 638, 394–400 (2025).
  4. Wang, R., Ying, B. E., et al. Hybrid electromagnetic toroidal vortices. Science Advances, 11(8), eads4797 (2025).
  5. Lawvere, F. W. Unity and identity of opposites in calculus and physics. Applied Categorical Structures, 4(2-3), 167-174 (1996).

Academic Statement

This paper for academic exchange and discussion purposes. The theoretical concepts discussed, particularly regarding topological vortex theory (TVT), are still in a developmental stage within physics, with many of its predictions awaiting experimental verification. Nevertheless, its conceptual framework is sufficiently robust to support a fruitful dialogue with dialectical materialism. This very act of interdisciplinary thinking exemplifies the dialectical relationship between theoretical thinking and empirical science, characterized by the unity of opposites, in the process of human understanding. They are presented here in a philosophical context to stimulate interdisciplinary dialogue. This work is shared under the principles of fair use for academic non-commercial purposes. Any citation should acknowledge the source. The views expressed are those of the author based on the specified theoretical framework and do not necessarily represent established scientific consensus or the final position of any affiliated institution.